Boy

Boy begins with an appealing promise: Taika Waititi will treat its comedy framework as a route into character rather than an excuse for noise. The early chemistry between James Rolleston and Te Aho Eketone Whitu gives Boy an immediate pulse. The story of Boy begins from a specific pressure point: Boy, an 11 year old child and devout Michael Jackson fan who lives on the east coast of New Zealand in 1984, gets a chance to know his absentee criminal father, who has returned to find a bag of money he buried years ago. By the end of its 1h 27m running time, the value of Boy rests less on novelty than on the care of its execution.

⁠

As director of Boy, Taika Waititi proves careful about tone and generally effective in the transitions between intimate material and larger demands. A strong scene in Boy often begins with a modest detail before Taika Waititi lets its meaning expand. For Boy, the film delivers more often than it misses because the central tone remains visible even during busy passages. The weakness in Boy is that the middle loses a little urgency, although Taika Waititi usually finds the original rhythm again.

⁠

Boy gains much of its identity from performer rhythm, a choice that makes the world readable as well as attractive. The contribution of Whenua Films allows Boy to combine performer rhythm with a consistent visual language. Within its New Zealand setting, Boy makes particularly good use of comic timing built around character when the story needs to change scale. Sound and editing preserve the personality of Boy by supporting detail instead of announcing every intended response.

⁠

Rather than summarise every event in Boy, it is enough to note how Boy places Michael Jackson under growing pressure. James Rolleston gives that tension a face, which stops Boy from becoming a mechanical sequence of developments. Taika Waititi uses New Zealand to widen the stakes of Boy without losing sight of the original problem. Where the central character becomes predictable, Boy recovers interest through the consequences surrounding it.

⁠

The acting in Boy is anchored by James Rolleston, who treats even functional scenes as opportunities to reveal character. Te Aho Eketone Whitu answers that approach with a different energy, giving Boy welcome friction whenever the pace begins to settle. Around them, Taika Waititi helps Boy feel like an ensemble piece rather than a vehicle with decorative support. Under Taika Waititi, the performances in Boy share a tone even when the writing gives them unequal depth.

⁠

Boy uses its comedy framework to consider embarrassment, status and the gap between confidence and reality. For the character played by James Rolleston, that idea gives Boy stakes beyond the next immediate obstacle. The recurring pressure of Michael Jackson prevents the theme in Boy from feeling like decoration added after the story. Taika Waititi makes Boy more thoughtful whenever the implications remain inside action and reaction.

⁠

Taken as a whole, Boy is a likeable film whose strengths survive its limitations for comedy fans who respond to personality and timing. Boy leaves its strongest impression through performer rhythm, the work of James Rolleston and a clear understanding of tone. The limitations around how the middle loses a little urgency should be acknowledged, but they do not erase what Boy does well. I would return to Boy for its personality and its willingness to connect genre pleasure with recognisable feeling.