Close

Close is a drama with a clear idea of the experience it wants to create. Directed by Lukas Dhont, it leans on Eden Dambrine and Gustav De Waele to give the material a human centre. The spoiler light setup draws Leo, Remi and Struggling into the same story, creating a specific hook without requiring a long recap. That is enough context to enter the film without spoiling the turns that give it shape.

⁠

The drama is most convincing in its quieter moments, when the performers can communicate what the dialogue leaves unsaid. The direction gives those exchanges room, and the emotional stakes grow from behaviour rather than forced explanation. That approach pays off remarkably often. The film feels assured without becoming airless, and it trusts the audience to notice details rather than explaining every intention. Even familiar material is handled with enough conviction to feel newly alive.

⁠

Performance wise, Eden Dambrine provides the most dependable anchor, bringing focus to the film whenever the plot threatens to become mechanical. Gustav De Waele offers a useful contrast in energy, and Émilie Dequenne helps widen the emotional range of the ensemble. The acting is not equally subtle in every scene, but the group understands the required tone and rarely appears to be performing in different films.

⁠

Thematically, Close is interested in communication, responsibility and the small decisions through which people either protect a relationship or allow distance to harden around it. The film is most affecting when those concerns remain embedded in behaviour, trusting the audience to recognise hurt and hope before the dialogue names them. The film is most persuasive when these ideas emerge from behaviour rather than speeches. That additional layer gives the story more purpose than a sequence of familiar genre beats, even if every implication is not explored with equal depth.

⁠

The filmmaking is deliberately supportive rather than showy. Framing stays close enough to catch changes in expression, the edit respects the rhythm of conversation, and music is used to shape tone without doing all the emotional work. This approach places pressure on the performers, but it also gives their reactions room to register before the story moves toward its next required beat.

⁠

My main reservation is that the polish occasionally becomes visible; a beat can feel arranged for maximum effect rather than discovered by the characters. Even then, the performances recover the sense of spontaneity quickly.

⁠

The final impression is generous and assured. Close rewards attention and gives drama viewers who value performance, emotional detail and patient character development plenty to admire without feeling like a product assembled from approved parts.