Daredevil (1964) #87

Reading Daredevil (1964) #87 as part of Marvel's wider catalogue reveals an issue with a clear personality and a surprisingly immediate sense of purpose. The issue was published on 10 May 1972 as part of Daredevil, with San Francisco providing the clearest point of entry. Its premise connects Widow with questions of identity and responsibility. That combination gives the opening a purpose beyond simply announcing another adventure.

⁠

Daredevil (1964) #87 treats the central conflict as a chain of consequences, which gives even familiar turns a useful sense of weight. Developments involving Widow draw attention to loyalty, while Electro widens the consequences beyond a private disagreement. The issue is uneven but lively, although the period conventions can feel blunt. Its best turn is the one that changes our understanding of the people involved as well as the practical problem before them.

⁠

The personalities in Daredevil (1964) #87 matter because they approach the same danger from noticeably different emotional positions. San Francisco can appear capable in one moment and uncertain in the next, while Widow can suggest a contrasting response to identity. That friction creates personality without reducing either side to a simple function of the plot. Smaller reactions also help Electro feel connected to the wider social world of Daredevil.

⁠

Daredevil (1964) #87 gives Gerry Conway room to balance plot information with personality. Exposition is most effective when it emerges through disagreement, urgency or a revealing change of mind. The language occasionally carries the habits of 1972, but those habits are also part of the issue's historical voice. More importantly, Daredevil (1964) #87 keeps returning to responsibility as an emotional concern rather than treating it as a slogan.

⁠

Visually, Daredevil (1964) #87 is carried by pencilling credited to Gene Colan. Composition keeps the eye moving in the intended direction, and stillness is used well when San Francisco needs a reaction to register. The cover credit names John Buscema, providing another useful part of the issue's creative record. Even when the available space is busy, Daredevil (1964) #87 usually knows which image should carry the dramatic weight.

⁠

Published on 10 May 1972, Daredevil (1964) #87 belongs to Marvel history while still working as an individual piece of storytelling. Beneath the immediate conflict, the issue returns to identity, responsibility and loyalty. Those ideas work best when expressed through mistakes, compromises and moments of courage. The comic format and Marvel imprint place the publication within a wider catalogue, yet its strongest pleasures remain specific to these characters and this particular problem.

⁠

Taken as a whole, Daredevil (1964) #87 is uneven but lively and easy to recommend to readers exploring Marvel's catalogue in order. Readers should expect that the period conventions can feel blunt, but that limitation does not erase the energy of the writing or the usefulness of the visual storytelling. The part I kept returning to was how the dilemma around San Francisco turns a question of danger into something personal. By the closing pages, Daredevil (1964) #87 feels like a complete encounter with Marvel history rather than a record that exists only to fill a gap.