Issues
- The daily whale
- 3 days ago
- 2 min read
A spoiler light review of Issues should begin with tone, because Van Elder understands exactly how this comedy ought to feel. Issues gains early credibility from Ben Watkins, whose presence is balanced by the different rhythm of Laz Alonso. The foundation of Issues can be stated simply: Royce, a straight laced accountant and Damien, a playboy real estate agent are cousins and housemates at the crossroads of their lives. Within its 1h 27m running time, Issues reveals both the benefits and the limits of that disciplined approach.
A close look at Issues reveals how well judged reactions carries information that the dialogue wisely leaves alone. Under the production banner of Bullz Eye Productions, Issues treats well judged reactions as part of its storytelling grammar. Performer rhythm gives Issues a stronger sense of place within its United States context. The technical departments of Issues remain coordinated, so polish supports involvement instead of creating distance.
Rather than summarise every event in Issues, it is enough to note how Royce places Damien under growing pressure. Ben Watkins gives that tension a face, which stops Issues from becoming a mechanical sequence of developments. Van Elder uses Things to widen the stakes of Issues without losing sight of the original problem. Where Toni becomes predictable, Issues recovers interest through the consequences surrounding it.
The thematic thread that gives Issues weight is embarrassment, status and the gap between confidence and reality. Ben Watkins grounds that thread so Issues never has to choose completely between entertainment and reflection. A recurring focus on Damien gives the ideas in Issues enough dramatic pressure to matter. Under Van Elder, Issues works best when viewers are invited to notice the theme before any character explains it.
Performance is the clearest human asset in Issues, beginning with the committed centre provided by Ben Watkins. Laz Alonso keeps Issues from settling into one emotional register by approaching the material from another angle. The presence of Shawna Vinson gives the surrounding world of Issues additional texture without distracting from the main line. When Van Elder holds on a reaction, Issues communicates more efficiently than another explanatory exchange could manage.
The directorial personality of Issues comes from Van Elder remaining engaging in bursts but unable to maintain the same control when the premise invites excess. Within Issues, Van Elder repeatedly favours readable choices over attention seeking flourishes. That discipline explains why worthwhile ideas compete with an uneven structure in Issues rather than appearing only in isolated scenes. Where Issues becomes less convincing, the pace alternates between hurry and drift, and the loss of control is noticeable without becoming fatal.
Overall, Issues amounts to a qualified recommendation and should suit comedy fans who respond to personality and timing. The combination of Ben Watkins, Van Elder and well judged reactions gives Issues a specific identity. Although the pace alternates between hurry and drift in Issues, the film recovers through craft and committed performance. For the audience it understands, Issues offers enough character to remain worthwhile after the immediate plot has faded.
Comments