Queen Bees
Queen Bees arrives as a comedy directed by Michael Lembeck, and its first strength is a clear sense of purpose. Ellen Burstyn and Jane Curtin give Queen Bees a recognisable human centre before the larger mechanics take over. The central situation in Queen Bees comes into focus without a long explanation: After reluctantly agreeing to move into a home for seniors, a woman encounters a clique of mean spirited women and an amorous widower. Across its 1h 40m running time, Michael Lembeck keeps Queen Bees engaging in bursts but unable to maintain the same control.
Queen Bees gains much of its identity from well judged reactions, a choice that makes the world readable as well as attractive. The contribution of Astute Films allows Queen Bees to combine well judged reactions with a consistent visual language. Within its United States setting, Queen Bees makes particularly good use of performer rhythm when the story needs to change scale. Sound and editing preserve the personality of Queen Bees by supporting detail instead of announcing every intended response.
The narrative of Queen Bees works from a simple but productive collision between the central character and an important relationship. Through Ellen Burstyn, Queen Bees keeps that premise rooted in a reaction the audience can understand. Donald Martin introduces a difficult choice at a useful point, giving Queen Bees a reason to change pace without abandoning its emotional line. The handling of the wider conflict is not equally fresh, yet Queen Bees usually earns attention through clarity rather than surprise alone.
What Queen Bees has to say is rooted in embarrassment, status and the gap between confidence and reality. The experience of Ellen Burstyn carries that question through Queen Bees without reducing the character to an example. The wider conflict helps Queen Bees test the theme through consequence instead of explanation. When Michael Lembeck allows ambiguity to remain, Queen Bees becomes more involving than a simple statement of intent.
As director of Queen Bees, Michael Lembeck proves engaging in bursts but unable to maintain the same control in the transitions between intimate material and larger demands. A strong scene in Queen Bees often begins with a modest detail before Michael Lembeck lets its meaning expand. For Queen Bees, worthwhile ideas compete with an uneven structure because the central tone remains visible even during busy passages. The weakness in Queen Bees is that the pace alternates between hurry and drift, although Michael Lembeck usually finds the original rhythm again.
The acting in Queen Bees is anchored by Ellen Burstyn, who treats even functional scenes as opportunities to reveal character. Jane Curtin answers that approach with a different energy, giving Queen Bees welcome friction whenever the pace begins to settle. Around them, Loretta Devine helps Queen Bees feel like an ensemble piece rather than a vehicle with decorative support. Under Michael Lembeck, the performances in Queen Bees share a tone even when the writing gives them unequal depth.
Overall, Queen Bees amounts to a qualified recommendation and should suit comedy fans who respond to personality and timing. The combination of Ellen Burstyn, Michael Lembeck and well judged reactions gives Queen Bees a specific identity. Although the pace alternates between hurry and drift in Queen Bees, the film recovers through craft and committed performance. For the audience it understands, Queen Bees offers enough character to remain worthwhile after the immediate plot has faded.
Comments