Ruby Gillman: Teenage Kraken

There is an appealing directness to Ruby Gillman: Teenage Kraken. It knows it is an animated film, understands the expectations attached to that label, and then looks for small ways to give the material its own voice. Directed by Kirk DeMicco and Faryn Pearl, it leans on Jane Fonda and Lana Condor to give the material a human centre. At story level, year old, learns and comes shape the central setup, but the later turns are best left for the film to reveal.

⁠

The animation gives the film its clearest identity, especially when colour, movement and comic timing work together. The voice performances keep the characters from feeling like pieces on a storyboard, and the visual energy rarely becomes difficult to follow. The approach works in patches rather than as a complete whole. Several scenes find the right tone, and the cast occasionally lifts the material above its more predictable instincts. Elsewhere, the pacing loosens and the film seems uncertain about which idea deserves priority.

⁠

Performance wise, Jane Fonda provides the most dependable anchor, bringing focus to the film whenever the plot threatens to become mechanical. Lana Condor offers a useful contrast in energy, and Toni Collette helps widen the emotional range of the ensemble. The acting is not equally subtle in every scene, but the group understands the required tone and rarely appears to be performing in different films.

⁠

Thematically, Ruby Gillman: Teenage Kraken is interested in identity, belonging and the difficult step of deciding who you are when other people have already supplied an answer. The visual freedom makes those ideas accessible, but the emotional value comes from recognisable uncertainty beneath the colour and movement. The film is most persuasive when these ideas emerge from behaviour rather than speeches. That additional layer gives the story more purpose than a sequence of familiar genre beats, even if every implication is not explored with equal depth.

⁠

Visually, the film benefits from a clear relationship between design and storytelling. Colour, framing and movement guide attention instead of competing for it, while the editing generally preserves a sense of place. The sound work adds scale without flattening quieter details, which helps the larger moments feel like part of the same film as the intimate ones.

⁠

The main problem is that the film keeps signalling effects it has not fully earned. Emotional turns arrive before the relationships have enough texture, while the pacing alternates between hurry and drift. The result is watchable, but frustratingly close to being better.

⁠

Ruby Gillman: Teenage Kraken is difficult to recommend without qualifications. There are good performances and worthwhile ideas, but the execution remains uneven. Curious animation fans looking for visual personality as well as an accessible story may still find enough to enjoy.