Taking Lives

Taking Lives arrives as a thriller directed by D.J. Caruso, and its first strength is a clear sense of purpose. Angelina Jolie and Ethan Hawke give Taking Lives a recognisable human centre before the larger mechanics take over. The central situation in Taking Lives comes into focus without a long explanation: A murder spree in Montreal, with the killer embracing his victims' identities, leads to an investigation by the FBI agent Illeana Scott. Across its 1h 43m running time, D.J. Caruso keeps Taking Lives uncertain about tone and dramatic emphasis.

⁠

The central idea running through Taking Lives concerns trust, manipulation and the anxiety of acting without the full picture. Angelina Jolie gives that idea a human scale, allowing Taking Lives to remain accessible even when its world becomes larger. By returning to Illeana Scott, Taking Lives turns theme into a source of pressure rather than a message waiting to be delivered. The handling by D.J. Caruso lets Taking Lives leave a little interpretive room, which gives its better scenes an afterlife.

⁠

Taking Lives is most involving when the screenplay allows Montreal to complicate what initially appears to be a story about FBI. That shift gives Angelina Jolie a more specific problem to carry through Taking Lives. Working from material credited to Michael Pye, Taking Lives reveals Illeana Scott at a measured pace instead of rushing toward its largest turn. The later pressure around the central character shows why Taking Lives benefits whenever cause and consequence remain visibly connected.

⁠

D.J. Caruso gives Taking Lives a directorial line that is uncertain about tone and dramatic emphasis from its opening promise to its final movement. The staging of Taking Lives is strongest when D.J. Caruso allows motivation to determine pace instead of reversing that priority. Viewed as a complete piece, Taking Lives confirms that isolated moments suggest a more compelling version across most of the running time. A tighter version of Taking Lives would address how events happen without gathering enough dramatic force, yet the surrounding work remains persuasive.

⁠

Visually, Taking Lives is most persuasive when controlled information guides attention without becoming an attraction separate from the drama. Warner Bros. supports Taking Lives with controlled information, giving individual scenes a shared design logic. The United States production character of Taking Lives is clearest in its use of editing that steadily tightens pressure to make place feel consequential. Even during its busiest moments, Taking Lives benefits from an edit and sound mix that protect the immediate emotional line.

⁠

Taking Lives relies heavily on Angelina Jolie, and the performance responds with enough specificity to carry changes in mood. The contribution of Ethan Hawke gives Taking Lives a useful counterweight instead of merely echoing the lead. Kiefer Sutherland makes the smaller exchanges in Taking Lives count, often through timing rather than emphatic dialogue. D.J. Caruso understands that Taking Lives becomes more persuasive when the cast can imply feelings before the script names them.

⁠

Taken as a whole, Taking Lives is a film for only the most curious members of its likely audience for thriller fans who enjoy steady escalation and psychological pressure. Taking Lives leaves its strongest impression through controlled information, the work of Angelina Jolie and a clear understanding of tone. The limitations around how events happen without gathering enough dramatic force should be acknowledged, but they do not erase what Taking Lives does well. I would return to Taking Lives for its personality and its willingness to connect genre pleasure with recognisable feeling.