The School for Good and Evil

A spoiler free review of The School for Good and Evil begins with its confidence as a comedy. Directed by Paul Feig, it leans on Sophia Anne Caruso and Sofia Wylie to give the material a human centre. At story level, Best, Sophie and Agatha shape the central setup, but the later turns are best left for the film to reveal. Those ingredients give the film a useful foundation, but the lasting impression depends on how well it balances mood, character and momentum.

⁠

Its funniest moments come from contrast: confident characters meeting inconvenient reality, or a serious setup collapsing at exactly the wrong time. That comic rhythm gives the film personality beyond the basic premise. Unfortunately, the film rarely settles into a convincing rhythm. Scenes arrive with clear intentions but limited emotional build, leaving the cast to supply weight that the writing has not earned. The premise still has appeal, yet too much of that potential remains on the page.

⁠

Sophia Anne Caruso and Sofia Wylie carry much of the emotional responsibility, and their different approaches keep the central relationship from becoming one note. Laurence Fishburne makes a strong impression without pulling focus from the main line. Paul Feig's direction gives reactions time to register, which is important in a film where a look or hesitation can communicate more efficiently than another explanatory exchange.

⁠

Thematically, The School for Good and Evil is interested in status, embarrassment and the gap between the person someone wants to be and the person everyone else can plainly see. The humour matters because it exposes vanity and vulnerability at the same time, allowing a joke to reveal character instead of merely interrupting the story. The film is most persuasive when these ideas emerge from behaviour rather than speeches. That additional layer gives the story more purpose than a sequence of familiar genre beats, even if every implication is not explored with equal depth.

⁠

Craft choices keep attention on people. The camera favours readable compositions, scenes are allowed to develop through interaction, and the edit usually avoids cutting away from a useful reaction. Music and production design provide atmosphere, but neither is permitted to overwhelm the emotional line, giving the film a consistency that helps even its quieter passages remain purposeful.

⁠

The film's choices are often obvious without being satisfying. It pushes plot points forward while leaving relationships thin, so later consequences have limited weight. There are flashes of competence, but not enough personality to make the experience memorable.

⁠

Overall, The School for Good and Evil is more missed opportunity than satisfying experience. There are isolated strengths, but I cannot recommend it beyond very curious comedy fans who enjoy character, timing and an ensemble willing to look a little foolish.